• limelight79@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’ve never seen men’s underpants with pockets. But I’m also not researching the topic extensively, so it’s possible this is a development in undergarment tech that I’m not aware of.

    • y0kai [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I dated a girl once who was amazed by the “pocket” in my boxer-briefs until she found it it was actually just the weird hole thing they put in the front that acts as a fly.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I have a theory that that’s not actually what that’s for. Like, men’s briefs are sort of double-breasted, there’s one flap that comes from one side almost all the way across, and then another outside of that that goes from the other side almost all the way across. It’s not really positioned or shaped in such a way that makes digging your dick out for dick-related activities easy or comfortable. But it does make for a functional expansion joint that allows a 100% cotton garment snugly house a bulge that changes size and position throughout the day.

        There often is a pocket-like area between the layers where they’re both attached to the sides down to the cross-ass seam, but I’m confident in saying men don’t store things there. You look REALLY STRANGE accessing that compartment, and objects placed there will rest uncomfortably against the scrotum, and come out smelling of taint sweat.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I once came across a pair of some kind of synthetic silk man thongs. That had three pockets. One for your junk, another for your phone and the third for your dick and balls.

      They were like 90 dollars a pair.

      I guess it’s for when you need to be sexy and functional.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        This just reminded me. I bought a skort a year or two ago because it had awesome pockets. I didn’t realize til I bought it, but it was technically a swimsuit bottom (albeit with a skirt much longer than I’d expect on a swimsuit.)

        It has a pocket like in the comic - against the leg, normally hidden under the skirt portion. It also has a zippered pocket on one of the sides of the skirt fabric. These pockets are superior to those in any of my regular pants.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I have compression shorts that I run in that are the closest thing. Otherwise, if I’m just in underwear, or maybe a pair of gym shorts with no pocket, just throwing the phone in the waistband is sufficient. Just need something better for running.

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Is she getting mixed up with the fly? I’ve never seen a phone pocket, or any pocket, and don’t quite see the purpose

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’ve started wearing molle pouches on my belt, so I have pockets wether I’m wearing pants or not.

    I’m currently carrying 2 water bottles, my phone, my work phone, sunglasses, and several tools that I need constantly.

    highly recommend, just wish they were available in fun colors and designs instead of exclusively tacticool bullshit.

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’ve seen a few molle pouches in bright colors, but not too many styles.

      If you can sew, I think you could have a hell of a time on Etsy until Vera Bradley releases a Molle collection, lol.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I remember watching this TV fashion contest thing quite a long time ago. The host of this contest was this old, wrinkly French lady who was a long time veteran in women’s fashion (apparently).

    So in the episode the upstart designers had to create… I think… Three fashionable pants for women. One of the contestants created all three of her pants with pockets, and I think one of them had some excessive pockets.

    She was dismissed by the host immediately, before the model even wore any of the pants. Basically the episode was already decided, as that contestant got eliminated on the spot.

    The reason? Well, that veteran fashion designer stated something along the lines of; “The female form is the most beautiful and powerful thing we have, and we can’t have pockets ruin that. It’s for women to accessorise with a handbag”.

    This stuck with me for all these years, because I was so revulsed when I saw that. What a load of bullshit. A load of pretentious garbage.

    • scratchee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Well now I have rage directed at some ancient French lady that I really don’t know what to do with.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        She’s probably long dead. But her out-dated idealogies are probably still alive everywhere in fashion.

        Not that I think she created that ideal. But she certainly did her part in propagating it.

        • tamal3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Fucking scabs, I feel a similar sense of disappointment that I felt talking to women who said they didn’t vote for Kamala Harris or Hillary Clinton because their voices were too shrill.

  • teslasaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Old hag shouting at clouds.

    Considering the amount of complaints about this issue, wouldn’t there be a screaming demand for them in clothing stores?

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      What is up with the influx of misogynistic rhetoric on Lemmy lately? We don’t support that here.

      • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Its tongue in cheeck. Of all the inequalities between women and men this is super low on the list. Have you heard how actual misogynists speak?

        • y0kai [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          honestly, among other things, they say things like “cope and seethe” lmao

          I get that you were being satirical but it didn’t translate well to me either haha

          • bitcrafter@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Thanks, I appreciate you starting from the understanding that their intent was to be satirical and then explaining why it did not translate well, rather than just loudly accusing them of being misogynistic. Yours is the only comment that reached my brain rather than causing it to reflexively react.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          “Haha I was just kidding” is precisely what people say when called out on insults like this.

          It’s not funny, and yes, it’s exactly the type of things misogynists say.

          • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Funny how when there’s a thread about misogyny on Lemmy, the comments are full of guys chiming in about “never seeing it.” But when someone points out problematic comments in real time, the downvote ratio is always wack.

            Which means guys are seeing it. Which makes it hard not to assume that, for many, the ignorance is willful.

          • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            If someone is unironically basing a sense of gender superiority on having pockets I feel bad for them.

      • bitcrafter@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Do you reject with equal vehemence the rhetoric advocating for violence in the comic in the last panel?

        Burn it all to the mother-fucking ground!

            • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              What’s the difference between this and the “kill it with fire” meme that’s been floating around for years? Have we really reached such a low point in public literacy that the use of hyperbole in a comic strip requires a disclaimer?

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Are we doing performative outrage over pockets on women’s clothing again? Cool, cool.

    Women wear clothing that is more form fitting, and stuff in pockets deforms the figure. That’s why purses are a thing. If you are hellbent on big pockets sporting goods stores have hiking trousers with big cargo pockets.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Hi. Person who has identified male my entire life here.

      I have no idea what this “cell phone pocket” in underwear thing is about. Sounds like lunacy to me.

      That said, give pockets to women who want pockets. It is baffling to me that this is still a thing.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Lots of pants out there that have pockets. They often choose not to buy them. And when they do, they put nothing in them.

        For what it’s worth, according to my wife and 4 daughters it’s because it’s because if you put things in your pockets like guys do, it ruins the lines and look. And according to our oldest daughter, it’s why cargo shorts and pants look bad on men. And should never be worn.

    • vinayv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Those are definitely real. All my underwears (trunks) have 2 pockets each and I can put my phone in it. FYI, I’m from India

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’ve been given gifts of underwear with pockets. They might hold one of the old style cell phones, at the peak of ‘small is best.’