• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    they don’t care. you’re not the audience. the tech industry lives on hype. now it’s ai because before that they did it with nft and that failed. and crypto failed. tech needs a grift going to keep investors investing. when the bubble bursts again they’ll come up with some other bullshit grift because making useful things is hard work.

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I was ok with crypto and nft because it was up to me to decide if I want to get involved in it or not.

      AI does seem to have impact at jobs, at least employers are trying to use it and see if it actually will allow them to hire less staff, I see that for SWE. I don’t think AI will do much there though.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        it’s not up to you, it just failed before it could be implemented. many publishers already commit to in-game nfts before they had to back down because it fell apart too quickly (and some still haven’t). if it held on for just a couple more years there wouldn’t be a single aaa title that doesn’t have nfts today.

        crypto was more complicated because unlike these two you can’t just add it and say “here, this is all crypto now” because it requires prior commitment and it’s way too complicated for the average person. plus it doesn’t have much benefit: people already give you money and buy fake coins anyway.

        I’m giving examples from games because it’s the most exploitative market but these would also seep into other apps and services if not for the hurdles and failures. so now we’re stuck with this. everyone’s doing it because it’s a gold rush except instead of gold it’s literal shit, and instead of a rush it’s literal shit.

        — tangent —

        … and just today I realized I had to switch back to Google assistant because literally the only thing gemini can do is talk back to me, but it can’t do anything useful, including the simplest shit like converting currency.

        “I’m sorry, I’m still learning” – why, bitch? why don’t you already know this? what good are you if I ask you to do something for convenience and instead you tell me to do it manually and start explaining how I can do the most basic shit that you can’t do as if I’m the fucking idiot.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yup, you can see it in talks on annual tech conferences. Last year it was APIs, this year it’s all AI. They’ll just move on to the next trendy thing next year.

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        To be fair, APIs have been around since the 70s,and are not trendy, they’re just required to have a common interface for applications to request and perform actions with each other.

        But yeah, AI is mostly trendy bullshit

    • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nft didn’t fail, it was just the idiotic selling of jogs for obscene amounts that crashed (most of that was likely money laundering anyway). The tech still has a use.

      Wouldn’t exactly call crypto a failure, either, when we’re in the midst of another bull run.

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hated it when everything became ‘smart’.

    Now everything has ‘AI’.

    Nothing was smart. And that’s not AI.

    Everything costs more, everything has a stupid app that gets abandoned, IoT backend that’s on life support the moment it was turned on. Subscriptions everywhere! Everything is built with lower quality, lower standards.

  • Zement@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    My thermostat hides no brainier features behind an “Ai” subscription. Switching off the heating when the weather will be warm that day doesn’t need Ai… that’s not even machine learning, that’s a simple PID controller.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The problem isn’t AI. The problem is greedy, clueless management pushing half baked products of dubious value on consumers.

  • stinky@redlemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Forcing AI into everything maximizes efficiency, automates repetitive tasks, and unlocks insights from vast data sets that humans can’t process as effectively. It enhances personalization in services, driving innovation and improving user experiences across industries. However, thoughtful integration is critical to avoid ethical pitfalls, maintain human oversight, and ensure meaningful, responsible use of AI.

  • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I kind of like AI, sorry.

    But it should all be freely available & completely open sourced since they were all built with our collective knowledge. The crass commercialization/hoarding is what’s gross.

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I like what we could be doing with AI.

      For example there’s one AI that I read about awhile back that was given data sets on all the known human diseases and the medications that are used to treat them.

      Then it was given data sets of all the known chemical compounds(or something like that, can’t remember the exact wording)

      Then it was used to find new potential treatments for diseases. Like new antibiotics. Basically it gives medical researchers leads to follow.

      That’s fucking cool and beneficial to everyone. It’s a wonderful application of the tech. Do more of that please.