Exactly.
When the predictive text gives the right answer we label it “fact”
When the predictive text gives the wrong answer we label it “hallucination”
Both were arrived at by the exact same mechanism. It’s not a hallucination because “something went wrong” - both good and bad outputs are functionally identical. it’s only a hallucination because that’s what we humans - as actually thinking creatures - decided to name the output we don’t like.
Plus, the whole point of a signature is that it’s easily reproducible by you, but not by other people.
Fast and fluid in a way that feels good to your hand is therefore the best signature, whereas something written slowly and precisely is easier to copy.
Thanks, appreciate the suggestions
Lucky you! :)
For me, switching to Bluetooth half the time makess the audio go crackly and stuttering, which sometimes can be fixed by switching codec, sometimes not, and then after that happens my HDMI audio is screwed up too, even after turning Bluetooth off.
With steam games too, audio is the #1 most likely thing to be not working, or working improperly.
Lemmy is woke, so that checks out
Same for me with Markdown. Love the simplicity.
I went through a phase a while back of evaluating a bunch of note-taking and to-do apps, and hating almost all of them for being proprietary products with so much vendor lock-in.
I eventually settled on Joplin because it just uses plain old markdown, and allows you to selfhost the storage back-end so you own your data.
So because of that, my recipes are just a folder (and some subfolders) with markdown in Joplin.
These days, that’s pleasantly true :)
15 years ago was a different story. You’d have about a 50/50 shot of your trackpad working, one in three that your WiFi would work, and if you were hoping for a working webcam, you should just forget about it.
So even in modern times when you do an install and everything mostly just works, it still feels suspiciously miraculous.
It could actually be insanely overpowered depending on interpretation.
“Instantly see inside any empty container”
What does it mean to “see” inside a container? If that just means “know what the contents are” (i.e nothing) then it’s limited, but if it means literally see with remote sight, that’s much more useful - depending on this next part…
What does “inside” mean? Does it mean we can only observe the interior, or can we look out from the interior as if our point of view occupies it?
And finally, what constitutes an “empty container”? Is a container still a container if it doesn’t have a lid? Or do its sides need to be opaque? By most interpretations, a glass with no liquid would easily fit the definition of an empty container…
At its most favourable then, this power gives you the ability to remote surveil any location where a common, everyday empty glass could be found. Very powerful indeed.
A person with a hammer? Why does it need to be difficult :P
Or just go with direct address
“If your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.”
Yes. If the planet was stationary in space, it wouldn’t work. Approach from ‘behind’ the planet and you get a boost, approach from the ‘front’ and you hit the brakes.
The only thing on my phone that’s allowed to notify me are messaging apps, and even then, only for direct messages, not groups.
Social media, games, sites, and everything else can all fuck right off - you do not get to demand my attention unbidden, and if you misbehave you are going in the trash.
Quite probable the LLM didn’t even know that was there. Just because it appears in the chat window doesn’t mean it’s part of the LLMs chat history.
This is just Meta dumping bullshit ads in the chat in a way that is invisible to the chatbot.