• PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I haven’t heard that his defense team is trying to claim that… I feel like if that was reality they would have. Maybe not, but I feel it.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      A good defense team doesn’t go around screaming what their defense strategy is going to be. Just because they aren’t telling YOU, doesn’t mean they have a bad defense strategy. They drop their bombs when the time is right.

    • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      What would the defense say? “That wasn’t him, just someone who looks similar.”
      They already claim that by pleading innocent at the start.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Well thats the thing. Nobody in the history of court has plead innocent. Thats not a thing. You can plead guilty, no contest, or not guilty.

        And “not guilty” isn’t the same as “innocent”

      • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Not really… “not guilty” can mean, he didn’t do it, or else he was temporarily insane because he was in pain from his medical condition, or even Ed Snowden’s “yeah I did it and it was illegal but at the end of the day I was right to do it and I think I can convince a jury of that.” Or just the OJ Simpson “let’s talk about something else for a while and change the subject” defense. It could be a lot of things.

        But I do get it that that might be their defense and they’re just not saying anything about it because they’re waiting for the trial to lay out anything at all about it.