• ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I find furry porn disgusting because it borders on bestiality.

    The only reason bestiality is really a problem in the real world is because of the intelligence/sapience difference between humans and animals.

    That doesn’t exist in the fantasy worlds of furries, where the human-animal hybrids all have human-level intelligence.

    You’re using the same logic that made Australian authorities ban women with A-cup breasts from being porn actresses: ‘female children don’t have large breasts either, therefore porn of a flat-chested woman ‘borders on pedophilia’’.

    Ridiculous.

    • CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No. It’s clearly not the same logic. I have no problem with anyone’s body shape. If an actress were to act out the role of a child in an adult film, then I would have a problem. Since you want to take it there, then I’ll point out that you are using the same logic as the people who claim certain art is not pedophilic because the child’s body is canonically inhabited by a thousand year old soul. Is that context readily apparent? Is that context entirely relevant? I would argue it is not.

      • tsugu@gregtech.eu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Is that context readily apparent

        Yes.

        Visible human emotions, walks on two legs, exhibits clear intelligence (talks, reasons, makes jokes, etc.)

        They are called anthropomorphic for a reason. Nobody wants to fuck a real wolf.