Weird that they would extend terms but only by 1 year. If you’re already giving yourself total power and will presumably keep extending the term limits, why not just remove then entirely? Or at least make it 10 years or something?

The ideal woman

Well the term originated in Britain where they weren’t that popular at the time, and like the post says it was only if you wore short too much.

Bitch I am a fucking rape victim, and because I am a man and was rated by a woman no one believed me, so kindly shut your fucking mouth.

In that same instance I also had my rapist turn the accusation on me, and had people belive her inherently.

So I know what the fuck I’m talking about I know both sides of this argument. And I’m telling you, as a fuckjng victim, to listen to me.

Assume people are innocent until you have actual evidence they are not (unless the victim is a freind of yours obviously)

Except he was already being published? This is a direct response to the allegations, so it’s defacto a punishment.

To continue the analogy, if a kid get a copy of the new Fifa game at Christmas every year, then one year he get into a fight or something and his parent decides not to buy him Fifa anymore as a direct consequence of that, then it is 100% a punishment.

They are taking a disciplinary action against them as a direct consequence of their actions. That’s by definition a punishment.

The crime is the non consensual part of it, not the act itself.

I’m not pretending they don’t exist, they’re just not concrete evidence.

It being public opinion is still not a justification to throw out one of the most basic principles of morality?

He doesn’t have the “right” to. But something not being a right doesn’t mean denying it isn’t a punishment?

Kids don’t have the “right” to play video games, but a parent can still punish their child by refusing to let them play them, no?

Refusing to publish someone’s work is not a punishment. He doesn’t have the right to be published.

Bad argument IMO. Of course that’s a punishment. If it was a case of people refusing to publish someone’s work for non sexual assault based reasons, we would consider it a punishment.

The proof is that Cosby admitted to it.

Okay but none of that is evidence?

The idea of innocence until proven guilty is a corner stone of modern morality, and one we don’t throw out for any other crime.

Do you think we should apply this standard to to every crime, that if we have enough circumstantial evidence we should just assume someone is guilty?

So you’re saying we need to start pumping out low quality left wing brainrot?

I wonder if a bunch of pro palestianian protestors started “giving their hearts” to the people of Israel, if suddenly it would have a different meaning.

Oh yeah

I wish people would put me in the girlfriend zone ( I’m a man)

Or the freindzonr would be nice too.

deleted by creator

Cool, the point is tiktok is spyware that sends info the the parent company in China, where the US doesn’t have control.

Serious answer: because it’s owned by a US citizen and is operated and HQ’d in the US, so the the US government has effectively full control over it and can monitor it.

That’s not a lot better from an end user privacy and security point. But is wayyyyyyyyyy better from a national security standpoint.

That’s what the whattaboutism implies.

and at a deficit, you

Well that’s the thing, carbs are just very calorie dense so eating cards makes it harder to eat at a deficit.

Or a white woman in black clothes, or nail Polish, or eyeliner, or in fishnets, or an e-girl or…