I’ve known this fact in the past, but I’m not sure I’d remember it in the moment.

You have a difficult time of grasping their points. Bye.

Sure, if we’re disingenuously ignoring the meanings and implications of words today for some reason.

Except there are examples of “temporary” not meaning temporary in similar cases, and we didn’t even have to leave the post-cold war United States to find one.

Maybe don’t rely on cloud garbage for basic development?

We’re not using the bandwidth we have. Many US cities have service with 1Gbps download speed available. I have it for my own reasons. Servers are the bottleneck; they rarely even reach half that speed.

If we’re not using 1Gbps, why should we believe something would pop up if we had 50Gbps?

Now, direct addressing where everyone can be a server and bandwidth utilization is spread more towards the edges of the network? Then you have something that could saturate 1Gbps. But you can’t do that on IPv4.

Except we need IPv6 before that’s at all viable.

We are not even filling out the bandwidth of pipes we have to the home right now. “If you build it, they will come” does not apply when there’s already something there that isn’t being fully utilized.

lol

Those cables are hard to terminate properly. There’s an outer grounding sheath that needs to be connected up at both ends. Except for short connections, I find it easier/cheaper to use fiber.

You can always hope it’s better than it actually is.

It has nothing to do with latency, and everything to do with not being able to directly address things behind NAT.

Edit: and please, nobody argue that NAT increases security. That dumbass argument should have died the moment it was first uttered.

That goes without saying.

That’s entirely speculative. There are diminishing returns. Unless you’re going to host your own YouTube, the use case for 50Gbps connections to the home is quite small. 4K video streaming at Ultra HD Blu-ray bitrates doesn’t even come close to saturating 1Gbps, and all streaming services compress 4K video significantly more than what Ultra HD Blu-ray offers. The server side is the limit, not home connections.

Now, if you want to talk about self-hosting stuff and returning the Internet to a more peer-to-peer architecture, then you need IPv6. Having any kind of NAT in the way is not going to work. Connection speed still isn’t that important.

We’ll solve that with AI. Because you can solve anything by saying “AI”.

Also doesn’t help that SMB is single threaded. Completely mismatched for the era of multicore processors and SSDs.

Not OP, but I have my NAS and my office PC on 10Gbps SFP+ fiber, but that’s so I can have fast speeds to my NAS. Spinning platters are now the limiting factor on throughput, and it’ll be a while before SSDs come down in price enough for the kind of data hoarding volume I have. Roughly needs to be cut in half two more times, which is maybe closer than we all think.

2.5Gbps switches are generally good enough for home use while using plain copper wires, but I use a lot of old enterprise hardware on my network. Enterprise hardware never heard of 2.5Gbps ethernet.

Also, I found out my Unifi Edgerouter X maxed out at 500Mbps unless I shut off a lot of features. Upgraded to an OPNsense box. There’s probably a lot of home user routers that are similarly limited.

Interesting–when I made a similar argument on Reddit some years ago, networking geniuses assured me that they needed more than 1Gbps to play lag-free games. This on /r/programming, no less.

360 VR experience with 16K resolution, highly textured touchable surfaces, and smell-o-vision. Only a $40 Meta subscription with ads.

. . . arm Linux itself is still a very small market . . .

Ahem

Alpha, yes, and modern Windows has been ported to ARM.

If teeth regenerate, do we have to constantly chew on things like rodents? Or is it an as-needed thing?