deaf_fish

A person can’t inform others faster than the speed of light.

Teacher: I meant the global we. So it would average out to 8 minutes.

I never implied that DEI was worse than no DEI. In fact I said I mostly liked it. Also only doing DEI when there is profit is the definition of DEI to companies. Companies are not doing DEI because it’s the right thing to do. They’re doing it because it makes them the money that they’ve left on the table by being racist, sexist, or whatever.

I’ve talked to the DEI consultant. “If being equitable loses money, then don’t do it.”

It does have a definition though and there is still power in that.

How isn’t it? The company I’m working for is touting it as them being so progressive. Meanwhile, they’re only making changes that make them more money. None of the changes they’re making is adding any risk.

I mostly like DEI. But I’m concerned that it is running cover for corporations. DEI is not about expanding opportunities to people evenly. DEI is about expanding opportunities to people that make the company more money. DEI alone is not enough for a fair and equitable society.

I mean you can exist in this world if you want to. It is more fun than the truth which is sad and boring.

Most people really do care and have good intentions, but are too overworked and too uneducated to pull apart the propaganda that’s being pushed to them 24/7.

The oligarchs didn’t win when Trump got elected the second time. The won when they got control over the media. That was a while back.

I think Trump is going to try to work out a deal where TickTok gets to stay the way it is if the company publicly blames Democrats for all the noise.

I broke my pinky toe because of bed sheets hanging off the bed in a specific way while I walked by.

To this day it is the only broken bone I’ve ever had.

I don’t know whether to be proud or embarrassed.

One of the weirder of votes I’ve done. Technically correct but… Gahh staying alive is a primary goal.

I mean it’s probably not true… But for me it is spiritually true.

Ladies and gentlemen, this was their response. If they had a better one, they would have used it.

Yes, it is antagonistic. But is it bad to be antagonistic to people who think that men’s feelings are more important that women’s safety?

Why? Women like sex, they also like sex with men. Men like sex. Where is the problem?

This is not antagonizing men. This is important data for men. Do you want to get laid? Understand where women are coming from. Don’t do spooky shit on dates.

Listen, I understand. It’s bad news, but it is what it is. It’s reality. It’s like women saying if you never take a shower or bath in your entire life, a relationship is out of the question.

Why? The sign seems fine to me.