Oh Ok. Sorry, it just can’t across really negative rather than pointing out a potential flaw. I can see difficulties enforcing it by the workers like you mention

Thanks for taking the time to reply. Will have to reconsider my choices here!

Im curious about your argument because this would justify not putting any rules at any time. No cigarettes for under age in shops (might attack a shop keeper), no alcohol in pubs (might attack a bartender), no fines for speeding (might attack cameras or police), no parking restrictions (might attack ticket wardens), etc.

Maybe the threat of fines are not enough to change this behaviour (which I can understand in India after spending a lot of time there) so they are trying a novel approach. One thing Indian police will take more seriously is attacking a worker for applying the rules compared to risking your own life.

Why is it shitty? I am not trying to deny it, just really curious what it is about