

I guess wors in general are good at pirtraying their meanings/definitions? ┐(゚ ~゚ )┌
I guess wors in general are good at pirtraying their meanings/definitions? ┐(゚ ~゚ )┌
I laughed too hard about this.
The true thought dilemmas of human nature. Is something only a shower thought or was enough thinking involved to consider it mildly interesting.
I miss those nature shows. They are way more interesting than they sound on paper. Thanks for reminding me of those and solving my analysis paralysis.
This sounds like what tge commission was saying, right? The court did not rule against them per se, it just said all the rules of tge game actually have to be codified which is fair.
This is what I was thinking. Most people probably just come together algorithmically or by having played a round together, and not necessarily by search. If there is the need to search for a specific player, there is also often a second player ID that can be used instead of the display name.
How is it that there is always a fitting xkcd no matter what kind of hilarious situation is mentioned?
As another dev I agree with the other reply. Even if it seems really small, it still is something that should eventually get fixed and therefore can be considered a bug. It makes it easier to track everything that needs to be done if it is all in thr bug tracker. Worst case scenario if it is considered irrelevant it will just be given an extremely low priority in the bug tracker.
Oh, so that is how those headphones work. I had an MRI a long time ago as a child, and really can’t remember much about it at all.
Was it really the headphones being low quality or is the MRI just so loud that any headphones would sound terrible?
And this is why double negatives are in general frowned upon in the English language, because they make the content much more difficult to understand.
You had me in the last sentence… sadly
Kayak? I’m really having trouble imagining how that works. Is that still normal police giving out the DUI or some kind of water police along a beach? Could you explain some more to put my imagination at ease?
Maybe to get a bunch of people to overdraft and then ahve to pay overdraft fees?
So use open source software, or indie developer software instead. Boycott the big tech. Build better things from scratch, and then we can ignore what these few people do.
Although it would probably be fitting to describe it as a subset. If you look at vision, then it is a spectrum that includes everyone. Even blind people. If you are looking at blindness, then it is a subset of the vision spectrum that only includes people that meet certain other criteria, i.e. below a certain threshold of vision. Same for autism disorder. Every human is on a mentality spectrum, and autism is a subset of that.
cheap for a human to complete but expensive for a computer to beat
This is the reason and logic. There are no advanced algorithms deciding your “humanness.”
I remember having tried to use a service before, and after trying my email address I got the error message that only hotmail, gmail, and icloud email addresses were allowed. Luckily I didn’t really need the service, so I noped out if there real quick.