I heard he tried to commission custom hentai but no one wanted to do anything that fucked up, so he started to develop ai, but as he is not getting anywhere, he is back trying to commission stuff.

I agree with you 100% and I want to highlight how weird that behavior is.

First you need to analyze an ad. Then you need to ignore that she has a brand and marketing 101 is that ad needs to fit the brand. Then you need to feel like you can make place for your partner to shine. Only then you can come to these poorly thought-out conclusions.

What it really is:

She takes photos that fits her branding. It is a play on “behind every great man is a great woman…” Highlighting that the greatness of a woman can be her strength/power and the greatness of a man can be their love and care.

What they read, “man behind woman, man take care of children, weak”. How insecure is that?

It is a loving supportive message to men and women and they read it like that.

I was a always-home person and I was obviously mostly single. Then I decided to go to a foreign country to learn a language. My father mocked me by saying I will bring a girl back home. But I didn’t bring back a girl… As she stayed there at the time… But we are planning on getting married…

So many people are single because they just stay at home.

Also if you want to find someone, love yourself first and don’t hunt for a partner. Just engage in social settings in your limited free time.

Clearly! It is such a self-tell.

The weirdest thing is “analyze” like that.

Her brand is “strong woman”. Of course, she takes photos for her brand like that. That is like the most basic basics of branding.

And it is literally a play on “behind every great man stands a great woman”. He is a great man as he is a great father and she is “great” as she is the “strong woman” that we know and “love”.

These people are so insecure… If you can’t make space for your partner to shine, you are a bad partner and insecure. And I am fairly certain, insecurity is not manly™.

Yeah, that isn’t what I am saying.

I am still talking about random people who would witness whatever the fuck someone would want to do there.

We are talking about public toilets. The “random” people are stranger going for a pee.

I was agreeing with you. I was saying that other e.g. men would walk into the toilets, so the criminal wouldn’t be alone with the victim and the criminal obviously doesn’t care about the rules. But the random e.g. men that wouldn’t enter as it is a women’s bathroom, but if it is unisex, those men would enter and would deter some crimes as there would be a witness.

Some people seem to think that public toilets need urinals and that urinals couldn’t be at e.g. the end of the toilet behind a cover, so people don’t have an accidental peek on a dick.

On entry, A sideview of the urinals and potential dicks are mandatory. If not at least 6 women see me pee against their will, I will sue the government. Look at my dick, woman!!!/s

People are just weird and can imagine that, like you don’t go out of your way to look at people change in locker rooms, you don’t go out of your way to see dicks on a public bathroom and that obviously unisex toilets would change how we build toilets.

As a man, I haven’t seen an other man’s dick on the toilet in months… Honestly I think years but I don’t want to lie.

Yeah they would want to live as other women do. They, as women, would do as other women would do and go to the unisex toilet.

There are some unisex toilets, cis and trans women have happily used these toilets.

I am interested in that direct contrast, wanna explain?

But it keeps out around 50% of the population whose presence would deter assault. People usually don’t get assaulted in a place with a lot of random witnesses.

Let me rephrase your question.

Why does a subset of women choose the women’s bathroom, instead of men’s bathroom?

Mhm I don’t know… Maybe… Just maybe… Because they are women? And they want to live their lives as what they are?

Not sure.

It was probably by being racist.

Yeah, but then they start “gaming”…

I just edited my comment, just no wonder you missed it.

In 2024, chatgtp was projected to use 226.8 GWh. You see, if people are “gaming” 24/7, it is quite wasteful.

Edit: just in case, it isn’t obvious. The hardware needs to be produced. The data collected. And they are scaling up. So my point was that even if you do locally sometimes a little bit of LLM, there is more energy consumed then just the energy used for that 1 prompt.

I am not necessarily got intellectual property but as long as they want to have IPs on their shit, they should respect everyone else’s. That is what is immoral.

How is it made sparsely? The training time for e.g. chatgtp 4 was 4 months. Chatgtp 3.5 was released in November 2023, chatgtp 4 was released in March 2024. How many months are between that? Oh look at that… They train their ai 24/7. For chatgtp 4 training, they consumed 7200MWh. The average American household consumes a little less than 11000kWh per year. They consumed in 1/3 of the time, 654 times the energy of the average American household. So in a year, they consume around 2000 times the electricity of an average American household. That is just training. And that is just electricity. We don’t even talk about the water. We are also ignoring that they are scaling up. So if they would which they didn’t, use the same resources to train their next models.

Edit: sidenote, in 2024, chatgtp was projected to use 226.8 GWh.

“ai bad” is obviously stupid.

Current LLM bad is very true. The method used to create is immoral, and are arguably illegal. In fact, some of the ai companies push to make what they did clearly illegal. How convenient…

And I hope you understand that using the LLM locally consuming the same amount as gaming is completely missing the point, right? The training and the required on-going training is what makes it so wasteful. That is like saying eating bananas in the winter in Sweden is not generating that much CO2 because the distance to the supermarket is not that far.

Apparently with figuring it out too.

Some much of this screams projection.

I mean “cubby”? How would you know? Or are we using words that we don’t understand again? Or did we pack out the projector again?

But seriously, good luck 🤞 you really need it.

I agree it is amusing that someone is losing their shit over nothing, makes baseless assumptions (like that I try to get people to take me serious), gets called out, and finally after everything else is gone because they are that bad at arguing and expressing their thoughts, they invent a new reality in which the memes community isn’t highly political and isn’t arguing all the time, just to try to insult someone.

Look at our conversation and tell me who throw the hissy fit. Who used insults instead of arguing the point? I think this is called projection. Good luck in life. You will need it.

Are you new here? Have you looked at how political the memes here are? Have you looked how often people argue in this community about memes? See, not really productive to write. But something that you might actually want to think about.

Lol, you think that was my reasoning? That wasn’t my reason. Again I have stated my reason for my actions, which wasn’t about ruin everyone else’s good time. If you cared you could read what I wrote. But apparently you are still not even asking for it. You just complain about a reasoning that you don’t know because you didn’t bother to read it while you can’t even be bothered to ask for it. And again, you feel that I ruined your fun because you want to read it as such. I dare to criticize a thin section of something and that “ruined” your good time while you specifically decided to read a -20 comment. Lol.

Let me Google for gore pictures and then complain that it killed my vibe.

You realize that you criticized me for thinking that joke had to conform to reality, to which I responded and I didn’t thought so, then you criticized me for thinking that other people can’t enjoy a joke because I didn’t, to which I responded to and I didn’t thought so. Why I was a “killjoy”, wasn’t the topic because you criticized what you thought I think, instead of my reasoning for my behavior. Which is only a killjoy because you want to read it as such.

I have explained my reasoning. I have explained what I dislike about the joke. I have explained why I dislike it. I have explained why I expressed that critic, in fact, specifically to you. If you don’t know why I am a “killjoy” when you should have read what I wrote, instead of expressing criticism of opinions that I don’t hold.

Quotes doesn’t mean that it is a quote. It can mean that the meaning of a word in this context doesn’t match the usual meaning. In this case, “negative” wasn’t meant to mean that the content is negative, but that the content got a negative reaction, expressed by down votes. Which is why I referenced the Down votes. I thought you would catch on.