“So they did and ditched the dollar”

But I could use it as a starting point for training and build from it with my own data. I could fork it. I couldn’t fork llama, I don’t have the weights.

And nobody is at the wheel…just kids playing HoI

I thought CUDA was NVIDIA-specific too, for a general version you had to use OpenACC or sth.

This election was not about the usual fake progressives vs neoliberal conservatives as you’re making it up to be. It was about a veneer of constitutionality at home vs blatant authoritarianism everywhere (that’s why you had Cheney and Harris on the same side). Lefties should have known better, but mainly centrists, swing voters and lo-info voters are the major chunk of voters to yell at.

Shock therapy incoming in 3…2…1…

But even that is better than war, I guess, what state were the social services in?

But what could there be to liquidate? Server racks? They don’t even own the offices, it’s all rented.

It would be nice to avoid a civil war (that would be more useful to enemies), but if you go to war with allies, it starts to become less unthinkable.

Better: just tell him greenland is full of spanish-speaking mexicans, it’s the only place he hasn’t talked about annexing.

If that doesn’t work, Greenland could always take all the undocumented immigrants the US deports and become a booming nordic economy that would be a pain to invade. And imagine the irony.

Yea, but they were fixed by military, economic and political means. Nobody is big enough to fix the US.

Yea, one trump salute election is bad, but two shows that it was not a fluke :/

true, here: https://web.archive.org/web/20250124230626/https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/trump-wants-to-buy-greenland-frederiksen-jvx0zt9mv

Maybe in some cases the price increase will stop sales (if it doesn’t, yea, it’s extra sales tax), which if there is no investment in expansion of local replacement capacity (of course not, trump and his toadies can’t think that far ahead) will lead to shortages in the US and less revenue for the exporter. Either way, it is a lose-lose situation, but trump will be happy to have hurt the exporter (or they lower the export value to absorb the tariff)…

Yea, but I guess Europe is in for a rough century squeezed between China and magaism, who are more likely to agree to dismember it than to let it be the halfway point.

It should take them at least as much effort to say what they want to say as it takes to debunk it, so they would have to “escalate” first before I put any effort into a reply and escalate my effort too.

Even if they are both honest, it only works when you agree on the aims each one is trying to reach (and ground rules, those are already in the sidebar). If one is trying to learn something and the other is trying to win the argument or pose for your potential readers…you get a shit debate where no progress is made.