So the point is that always only exactly 2 elements are compared and so you first have to split everything into groups of 2. Seems very inefficient for larger datasets, since you need to handle every single item over and over again and compare so so often. But not a sorting and comparison expert, so no idea if human sorting logic applies at all.

How does the last step sort an of the sizes? Why even have all the other steps if that one can do it all?

Honestly I could say that about a large portion of all card, but people buy them. That is really not a good argument against them. Better focus on all the actual shit instead, like… how they can’t do what the vehicle type is supposed to be for.

I am aware that we can detect IR with sensors…? But there are non that illuminate the planet and look for that reflection with a camera.

night vision, which uses infrared light to illuminate a scene that’s not visible to the naked eye.

I want to see that satellite with it’s massive IR device. Ha!

Who cares about rottentomatoes? Especially the “critic” number?

How is the nuclear sign in any way universally understandable? It is properly by learning it’s meaning.

I do not pay respect to sad stuff usually?

The same happens in science. Verifying or reproducing something needs to be incentivised.

Okay but why sad?

?

Their problem was never those ships traveling around mate. The environment they talk about is that right there where they are. On a global scale cruise ships are irrelevant.

You dropped this: /s

Why is this downvoted? Do you think he is serious?

They were easily just as bad as the Nazis.

Correct.

Look at the first picture. Green = on track.

Incorrect.

Yeah imagine someone shooting a q breast.

What an odd take. Why should people memorize something they pretty much never need? Just because using a different word might inconvenience someone a tiny bit at some point in time?

Oooof I know the word but I don’t think I should say it.