It’s the Telegraph; Egyptian TV host Tamer Amin is safe.

Eh, it’s the Telegraph.

What’s a two party state that’s one party down?

You did bitch on here.

As long as you don’t mind the fact that everyone else is on this particular one.

The network effect is a real thing, it’s not that simple.

1. No, he seems attention starved. Maybe he’s a Nazi as well, or maybe he’s just okay with Nazis. Honestly, supporting them to get your rocks off might be worse than genuinely agreeing with them, so that’s not really letting him off the hook.
2. Self-correction: Nuking people, maybe in a fellow NATO country. The hurricane thing was dumb but pretty much just dumb, Elon would have to go bigger to stay relevant.

OP really read more like a suggestion or fact than a statement of personal feeling. Otherwise, yeah, I would have just upvoted it.

Yeah, I’ve heard of that. Like, who’s that guy with the Greek name? I’ve also heard of gay fascists flip-flopping to the Wakanda North Korea thing.

Also, shout out to the gay weed-growing libertarians who get lumped in with fascists as “conservative”. I see you.

You’ve got it backwards. Toxic and aggressive people become conservatives (in Anglo countries) because it serves them emotionally.

Occasionally one is too queer to successfully do that, and have to find an alternate outlet, like stanning for North Korea or something.

Assuming you mean the election, “don’t worry”, fascists usually start meddling with the economy eventually.

Whether that means more or less ad watching, I can’t say.

Yeah, but just to pick one example, elites are entirely capable of being scared for their lives and being evil. That pretty much describes most historical systems. If you were serious about making change (which, let’s be honest, is pretty rare), you’d need a much better, more detailed plan.

Normalcy bias is a bitch. Congratulations on at least being aware of how not normal the situation is intellectually, it seems most people aren’t getting that far.

I mean, unless you can gut unrealistically broad consensus on which third party to vote for you just get Ross Perot again.

The US system is designed in a way that basically makes 2 parties a hard upper limit. If you want(ed) finer control than voting for the least worst candidate, you have to consider showing up to primaries and boring activist meetings.

Well, he must have fallen out of the headlines for a day.

I’m calling it, to keep outdoing himself he’s going to openly and seriously start suggesting nuking things.

Or just tolerating this shit, if you have the “fuck me with ads only” plan.

Yeah, there’s a history here. That being said, newspapers have included ads and purchase fees for a long time AFAIK.

Jesus fuck.

I mean, it was inevitable, but it’s still grating that it’s here, right?

You’re right, but that doesn’t mean it’s a good system. Charging for their services would be much less nonsensical in the end.

Man, I’m so mad I want to upvote this, even though I think it’s a lot more complicated than that.

Reliability has been one big problem I’ve heard about, which is pretty bad when you’re product is basically a big battery with few moving parts. TBF in the latest numbers Rivian is basically doing the same thing.

I’d be looking at the established car companies, because they’re basically worked out a lot of kinks already.