• bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m honestly amazed they didn’t have ads out of the gate, Meta’s whole schtick is advertising and data.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      They thought they could EEE the fediverse first.

      Turns out people on decentralised social media aren’t totally fucking brain dead and could see it coming a mile away.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        If they had any intention of EEE the fediverse, they wouldn’t have required users to opt into it, or made it unidirectional.

        I think it’s pretty clear at this point that their only intention was to head off antitrust actions. But I think it’s safe to say we won’t see anymore development on that front in the near future.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Facebook famously didn’t have ads for a long time, even when people were pressuring Zuck to add them to keep the site from going running out of capital. Call it a loss leader, call it enshittification or market capture, whatever. Most companies that can afford to will start out being really great to their users, and once they have captured a section of the market, they start clawing more of that value back for themselves and their investors.