• psx_crab@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    M$ have the history of killing golden goose they just bought, we can believe what we want but that doesn’t mean M$ know what they’re doing.

    And if they like money, they wouldn’t shoot their own foot.

    But i digress, there’s no reason game should cost $70 is the original topic.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is absolutely a reason for games to cost 70 bucks. Which is listed above multiple times, you should go re-read those posts. They paint a pretty clear picture, if I say so myself.

      On the MS question, it’s not relevant whether they made the wrong choice. The point is they thought they would do better this way. I guarantee they wouldn’t have shut down Team Cherry if they owned that. Pretty sure they’ll keep making Call of Duty. They may suck at understanding how to get a hit made, but they can still count.

      They did not think what they made out of Tango was enough.