• ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s broad consensus that’s featured there, so it manufactures consent less hard, and more importantly, the fact-check appears attaches to the original misinfo, so it gets reshared with it.

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          but broad consensus does not mean true.

          to me this just sounds like social media passing the buck to their users with no regard for accuracy. sure, whatever you guys want to believe, go for it.

          • nfh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think you and the person you’re responding to both have a point. They’re totally passing the buck to their users, but their users will probably be better at putting accurate information than they are. It’s a different set of problems to be sure, but I think it’s a preferable one

            • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              but their users will probably be better at putting accurate information than they are.

              “they” (Meta) was not the one fact-checking, it was a 3rd party service. And I don’t know why you assume a social media user base would be better at it, especially with highly politicized things like climate change, vaccines, wars, etc.

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                They think that because community notes are actually fairly good on Twitter. You’d think that they wouldn’t be, but somehow the extremist idiots don’t seem to be able to outshout the sensible majority.

                Just go on YouTube and search for community notes.

                • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  “fairly good” or not, the question is, is it better than a 3rd party service like the one Meta was using.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    So for the . . what seems like hundredth year in a row - anyone who’s using Facepals and Xitter please delete it. please. Just. Stop.

  • Fitik@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is a full announcement, sounds like they’re going on a full Twitter way

    A screenshot from Threads

    The original post has 1.5k likes and 2k replies so obv not everyone are happy about Twitter alternative just turning into Twitter