• Shareni@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Transportation of goods is mostly a capitalist issue. You don’t need to cover a cucumber with plastic and ship it half way across the world, while selling the local ones to richer countries. The same goes for the vast majority of “goods”. Remove all of that greedy, superfluous shit, and you’re left with minimal shipping needs.

  • truthfultemporarily@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah but DLS would be a significant downgrade for many people, who already fight the suggestion to only eat meat six days a week tooth and nail.

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6013539/

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10537420/

    https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.est.3c03957/suppl_file/es3c03957_si_001.pdf

    Things that count as DLS:

    • 10 m² of personal living space + 20 m² for every 4 ppl as bathroom / kitchen
    • 2100 kcal/day
    • 1400 kWh/year, but this already includes public services (education/healthcare)
    • 1 washing machine per 20 ppl
    • 2.4 kg clothing / year
    • wear tops for three days and bottoms for 15 days without washing
    • 1 laptop per 4 people with a yearly power consumption of 62 kWh. (bizzarely they talk about an 800 MHz computer and seem to confuse HDD and RAM). If your gaming computer used 400 W you could use it for 150 hr/year.
    • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m gonna need a lot more than 10 square meters of space if everyone is changing their shirts twice a week. Yuck.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You could double everything in this post too and that’s only 60% consumption.

          • 20 m² of personal living space + 20 m² for every 2 ppl as bathroom / kitchen
          • 4200 kcal/day
          • 2800 kWh/year, but this already includes public services (education/healthcare)
          • 1 washing machine per 10 ppl
          • 2.4 kg clothing / 6 months
          • wear tops for 1.5 days and bottoms for 7.5 days without washing
          • 1 laptop per 2 people with a yearly power consumption of 62 kWh. (bizzarely they talk about an 800 MHz computer and seem to confuse HDD and RAM). If your gaming computer used 400 W you could use it for 300 hr/year.

          That seems a lot more reasonable to me and we still come in under carrying capacity

        • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They live in a world where 700 million people are currently starving. Do you think you care about the washing machines if your children have nothing to eat?

        • astutemural@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          ITT: people who didn’t even glance at the study.

          Quoting from the study:

          “It is important to understand that the DLS represents a minimum floor for decent living. It does not represent a an aspirational standard and certainly does not represent a ceiling. However, it is also a level of welfare not currently achieved by the vast majority of people. A new paper by Hoffman et al finds that 96.5 percent of people in low- and middle-income countries are deprived of at least one DLS dimension…we can conclude that 6.4 billion people, more than 80% of the world’s population, are deprived of DLS.”

          The authors are not suggesting that everyone be forced on DLS at gunpoint. They are suggesting an absolute bare minimum standard that the overwhelming majority of people on Earth do not yet even have. Quite obviously any excess production could and would be used to increase standard of living.

    • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      A simpler solution is to simply abolish wealth hoarding, impose sensible consumption limits (so, no cars or commercial plane travel, no meat, no 800 watt gaming rigs), and continue to encourage population decline. Boom, everyone is healthy, the air is clean, and you can keep your house.

      • boomzilla@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Or at least feed the dogs plant based and phase out having cat as pets. IIRC it’s 20% of all livestock in the US that’s killed just for cats and dogs and about 70% of that 20% is for dogs on top of my head. Dog can live fine if not better on a well formulated plant based dog food. Just look at some of the reviews for Purina HA Vegetarian (it’s vegan btw) dog food. A lot of dog owners cured the gastro intestinal and lot of other problems their dogs had with it. I’m not affiliated. There are other well formulated plant based foods like AMI successfully used by many dog owners. Just seen a video on “The Dodo” of a dog who was at the verge of being put down because of weight loss till the veterinary got the idea the dog could have a meat allergy and advised said Purina food. The dog is now healthy and thriving again. That diet change on a global scale would take a huge burden off of the environment.