• Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    systemd was a solution in search of a problem. I saw it that way when it came along and still see it that way. I’m sure as usual that will ruffle the feathers of the zealots and fanatics. So be it. I’m not expressing their opinion on systemd but my own. I don’t see how its an improvement sysvinit. I can’ do the same things with both and indeed still maintain a sysvinit linux system that works just fine without systemd being involved.

    • kadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      systemd was a solution in search of a problem

      Systemd solved lots of problems for me and made things easier so you know… I guess they succeeded.

          • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Standard boiler plate response to not having had to ever do this. I started with Slackware Linux and still keep a installation around to keep up with how things work. I solve my own problems and its for that reason You’re explanation falls short. In truth it isn’t that difficult and it many ways preferable to not hand over control of services to one over reaching controller. I’ve had systemd hangup where sysv would have just kept on sailing.

            Its perhaps because I have so much experience with both that I can truly see how systemd isn’t the cure all its purported to be.